Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 175:2
א"ר יוסי בר חנינא שפצעה בפניה ואפחתה מכספה:
whereas regarding mere wounding, through which her pecuniary value would not [usually] decrease there was never any question [that the compensation would not go to the father. How then could R. Johanan speak of mere wounding?] — R. Jose b. Hanina replied: We suppose the wound to have been made in her face, thus causing her pecuniary value to be decreased. ONE WHO INJURES A CANAANITE SLAVE BELONGING TO ANOTHER PERSON IS [SIMILARLY] LIABLE FOR ALL [FIVE ITEMS]. R. JUDAH, HOWEVER, SAYS THAT NO DEGRADATION IS PAID IN THE CASE OF [CANAANITE] SLAVES. What is the reason of R. Judah? — As Scripture says:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XXV, 11. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 175:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.